Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1982No. 63419PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of armed robbery. On appeal, his primary contention is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for continuance. Held:

1. A motion for continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Absent a showing that it has been abused, that discretion will not be controlled. Crow v. State, 86 Ga. App. 11 (1) (70 SE2d 601) (1952). “There is no fixed rule as to the number of days that should, of right, be allowed counsel in a criminal case to prepare the case for trial, but the trial judge, in the exercise of his discretion to grant or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Meminger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API