Meminger v. State

Quillian, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for armed robbery by the use of an offensive weapon. Held:

1. In two enumerations defendant asserts error because two state’s witnesses testified that the testimony of Walker,. a co-defendant (who was not tried with defendant), was the same as his pretrial statement, over objection that the state was bolstering the testimony of Walker by the use of prior consistent statements.

There is no merit in these enumerations for two reasons.

Prior to the alleged bolstering testimony, the consistency of Walker’s testimony with his pretrial statement…