Legal Opinion
United States v. Ramirez-Perez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 2, 1999No. 96-9250PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
Homero Avellaneda-Gama (“Homero”), Maclavio Avellaneda-Gama (“Maclavio”), and William Ney Ramirez-Perez (“Ramirez”) challenge their convictions and sentences for multiple offenses relating to a methamphetamine distribution conspiracy. , We dispose of their challenges as follows. We vacate Maclavio’s convictions for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine, and remand the case for a new trial on those charges, because the district court violated the Bruton 1 rule when it allowed a prosecution witness to relate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Antonio Hernandez, Hector Giral, Yolanda BautaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Angel Pendas-Martinez and Andres Morrero-LasoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Trelliny T. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Jesus Hernando Angulo MosqueraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- State v. HemondSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- United States v. AlkufiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.