Legal Opinion

United States v. Antonio Hernandez, Hector Giral, Yolanda Bauta

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 16, 1990No. 88-5957PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

A jury convicted appellants Yolanda Bau-ta, Hector Giral and Antonio Hernandez for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of more than 500 grams of cocaine with intent to distribute. Appellant Bauta challenges her conviction, alleging that the evidence was insufficient to support the charges against her and that the unprofessional conduct of one of the prosecution’s witnesses rendered the trial unfair. Appellant Giral also argues insufficient evidence and further maintains that the district court erroneously permitted the jury to consider…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronn Darnell SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Ellis Burrell, Billy J. Henry, Jon P. Hammonds, William D. Hatch, John Jones, and Steven E. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. StarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Crowder, Rochelle A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API