Legal Opinion

Forman v. Chicago Title Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1995No. B074889Published

1Opinion of the Court

32 Cal.App.4th 998 (1995)

38 Cal. Rptr.2d 790

JOHN FORMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. B074889.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

February 27, 1995.

COUNSEL

Susan A. Mitchell for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Browne & Woods, Allan Browne, Allen B. Grodsky and Robert B. Broadbelt for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

In this case we hold the statute of limitations period on a title insurance policy is equitably tolled while the insurer determines whether to honor or reject a timely filed insurance…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API