Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State of Colorado

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided October 3, 1968No. Civ. A. C-871PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARRAJ, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff has invoked the jurisdiction of a three-judge court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284 seeking a permanent injunction restraining an action by an administrative board, acting under a Colorado state statute, contending that the statute and regulation promulgated thereunder are unconstitutional in that they violate the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment by permitting the taking of plaintiff’s property without just compensation and without due process of law.

Defendant North Kiowa Bijou Management District has moved to dismiss the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Robert F. Urbano v. The Board of Managers of the New Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Doe v. BoltonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Danielson v. VickroySupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Koehler v. OgilvieDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
  5. North Kiowa-Bijou Management District v. Ground Water CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API