State v. . Rice
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Coolc, J., at February Term, 1912, of Guilford. Tire fact's are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of the ‘Court by Mr. Chief Justice Claris.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, O. J.
The defendant, who lives outside the corporate limits of Greensboro, was indicted in the Municipal court of the city of Greensboro for unlawfully and willfully “keeping and running hogs in a lot within one-fourth of a mile of the corporate limits of the city of Greensboro,” in violation of the city ordinance which is set out and which provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to keep any hogs or pigs within the corporate limits of the city of Greensboro or within one-fourth of a mile of said limits.”
On appeal from the Municipal court the warrant was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Red "C" Oil Manufacturing Co. v. Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Van Hook v. City of SelmaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Chicago Packing & Provision Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Inhabitants of Quincy v. KennardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- State v. Shine.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Holmes v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Mitchell v. City of RoswellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Green v. . KitchinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- City of Raleigh v. MorandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Lawrence v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.