Legal Opinion
United States v. Walsh
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 19, 1947No. 718PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
This appeal brings before us § 301 (h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1040,1042, *43321 U. S. C. § 331 (h), which prohibits the giving of a false guaranty that any food, drug, device or cosmetic is not adulterated or misbranded within the meaning of the Act.
Appellee does business in San Diego, California, under the name of Kelp Laboratories. An information has been filed, charging appellee with having given a false guaranty in violation of § 301 (h). The following facts have been alleged: In February, 1943, appellee gave a continuing guaranty to Richard Harrison…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Steinhardt Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- United States v. Charles L. Heinle Specialty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1910
3Cited by52 opinions
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Five Gambling DevicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.