Legal Opinion
Gross on Behalf of Gross v. Running
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 31, 1987No. C8-86-1703PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment dismissing respondent motor company from appellants’ cause of action regarding defective design. Appellants claim the trial court improperly granted respondent’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because the verdict was reasonably supported by competent evidence. Respondent by notice of review challenges the trial court’s failure to award it costs and disbursements and to specifically rule on its alternative motion for a new trial. We affirm.
FACTS
In December 1979, defendant Patrick Running purchased a 1980 Ford F-150…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Lamb v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Thorn v. Glass DepotCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leo PIOTROWSKI; Katherine Piotrowski, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHWORTH PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Linda Thompson and Roy Hedbert v. Hirano Tecseed Company, Ltd. v. Sheldahl, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Westbrock v. Marshalltown Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Swanstrom v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- HNA Properties v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.