Legal Opinion

MacKey v. Philzona Petroleum Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1963No. 6764PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

The facts stated most favorably to plain- . tiffs in the court below show that Webber Mackey and his wife owned a retail petroleum business consisting essentially of nine retail service stations in Arizona. In June of 1956 the defendant John G. Phillips initiated discussions with Mackey which in general concerned Phillips buying into the business. At one time the parties agreed to a partnership arrangement but that arrangement was never consummated being abandoned by the decision of the parties to organize a corporation. Accordingly the defendant Philzona Petroleum…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Podol v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Garrett v. Reid-Cashion Land & Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Chung v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Mechanics Savings Bank v. GishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Nussbaumer v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YUMAArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Jerger v. RubinArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Edward Greenband Enterprises of Arizona v. PepperArizona Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API