Legal Opinion

Claflin v. Department of Natural Resources

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1973No. 245PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The first issue raised on this appeal is whether the circuit court had subject matter jurisdiction under sec. 227.16 (1), Stats., to consider Claflin’s petition for review.

Specifically, the DNR contends that there was no right for Claflin to seek a rehearing from the DNR and that accordingly when Claflin filed his petition for review in circuit court it was not filed within thirty days of the order sought to be reviewed; (it was not filed until October 6th, eighteen days too late according to the contention of the DNR).

The answer to this DNR contention is that Claflin did have a right to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hixon v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Brachtl v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Monahan v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hamilton v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against MarineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ray-O-Vac v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hilton Ex Rel. Pages Homeowners' v. DnrWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kosmatka v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Schoen v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API