Legal Opinion
Fobian v. Storage Technology Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided April 7, 1997No. Civil Action 3:96CV767PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.
FACTS
Defendant Storage Technology Corporation (“StorageTek”) manufactures, installs and maintains computer memory products. The Plaintiff, Mr. Fobian, began working for StorageTek’s predecessor in 1979. He was a Customer Service Engineer, or CSE.
In 1995, StorageTek had 12 CESs in the Richmond office. In late 1995, Mr. Fobian and two other employees were laid-off. 1 These three employees were the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murphy v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Krane v. Capital One Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Evans v. AtwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Hyman v. First Union Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Mills v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.