Legal Opinion
Dominion Oil Co. v. Pou
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 30, 1923No. 2148PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKlett, J.
The plaintiff, Jas. H. Pou, Jr., obtained a judgment for $6,500 against the defendant Dominion Oil Company upon the allegations:
That “C. N. Haskell was a duly authorized agent and representative of the defendant Dominion Oil Company, and duly authorized and empowered to purchase property upon its account and to bind said Dominion Oil Company to pay therefor, and duly authorized to appoint subagents and representatives, and to delegate to them such authority as he might see fit, and said C. N. Haskell was and is in complete charge and control of the affairs of said Dominion Oil Company; that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Heffron v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Morris v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Clegg v. BrannanTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Simpson v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Sanger v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- POU v. Dominion Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Spencer v. Presbyterian Board of Ministerial Relief & SustentationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Sims v. CallihanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Julian Petroleum Corp. v. EggerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Jenkins v. Parkersburg Rig & Reel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.