Klass v. Hayes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendants, contending that G.S. 1-76 applies, made their motion as a matter of right. Appeal from a ruling on a motion for a change of venue as a matter of right is not premature. Coats v. Hospital, 264 N.C. 332, 141 S.E. 2d 490 (1965) ; Cedar Works v. Lumber Co., 161 N.C. 603, 77 S.E. 770 (1913).
Insofar as pertinent to this appeal, G.S. 1-76 provides:
“Actions for the following causes must be tried in the county in which the subject of the action, or some part thereof, is situated, subject to the power of the court to change the place of trial in the cases provided by law:
* *…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coats v. Sampson County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Richmond Cedar Works v. J. L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Cedar Works v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Davis v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Fayetteville Street Christian SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated & Reidsville Transaction Corp. v. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- DesMarais v. DimmetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Pierce v. Associated Rest & Nursing Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Smith v. MarinerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.