Smith v. Mariner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Preliminarily we note that appellant is appealing from an interlocutory order, but since she is appealing from the denial of a change of venue as a matter of right pursuant to G.S. 1-76(4), her appeal is not premature. Klass v. Hayes, 29 N.C. App. 658, 225 S.E. 2d 612 (1976); see also DesMarais v. Dimmette, 70 N.C. App. 134, 318 S.E. 2d 887 (1984).
G.S. 1-76 provides in pertinent part:
Actions for the following causes must be tried in the county in which the subject of the action, or some part thereof, is situated ... (4) Recovery of personal property when the recovery of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Godley Const. Co., Inc. v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- DesMarais v. DimmetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Farmers Cooperative Exchange, Inc. v. TrullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Klass v. HayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Davis v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Pierce v. Associated Rest & Nursing Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- CAROLINA FOREST ASS'N, INC. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Taylor v. Interim Healthcare of Raleigh-Durham, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- CAROLINA FOREST ASS'N, INC. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009