Legal Opinion
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated & Reidsville Transaction Corp. v. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 29, 2000No. COA99-1369, COA99-1372PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FULLER, Judge.
Defendant in COA99-1369, Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Company (Durham), appeals from an order denying its motion to dismiss the declaratory judgment claims brought by plaintiff in that lawsuit, Coca-Cola Bottling Company Consolidated (Consolidated). We reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to grant Durham’s motion to dismiss. Defendants in COA99-1372, Reidsville Coca-Cola Bottling Company (Reidsville) and Consolidated, appeal from various orders of the trial court. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts underlying these two proceedings are as follows.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, a Michigan and Indiana Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- The Centennial Life Insurance Company v. Barbara Poston Victor PostonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Mission Insurance Company v. Puritan Fashions CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Rollston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Eckard v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Reid v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Mammoth Medical, Inc. v. BunnellKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.