Legal Opinion

Headman v. . Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that a deed under a tax sale of their land had been fraudulently obtained, and that the notice required by the law, before such a deed is executed, (263) was not given, and that plaintiff's only remedy was by foreclosure, and that the land was in the hands of a receiver, and was improperly listed in the name of the Southport Land Company, and by reason of the defects in the sale and deed a cloud has been put upon their title which they ask to be removed.

The defendants demurred to the complaint, assigning the following grounds of demurrer, which will…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Brewer v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Matthews v. Fry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Warren v. . WillifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. . NolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API