Headman v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN tried before Stacy, J., upon demurrer, at August Term, 1918, of BRUNSWICK. Appeal by defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that a deed under a tax sale of their land had been fraudulently obtained, and that *263tbe notice required by tire law, before sucli a deed is executed, was not given, and that plaintiff’s only remedy was by foreclosure, and that the land was in the hands of a receiver, and was improperly listed in the name of the Southport Land Company, and by reason of the defects in the sale and deed a cloud has been put upon their title which they ask to be removed.
The defendants demurred to the complaint, assigning the following grounds of demurrer, which will be…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brewer v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Matthews v. Fry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Warren v. . WillifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Rexford v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- North Carolina Railroad v. StorySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Price v. SlagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Wade v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Price v. . SlagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.