Legal Opinion
Bell v. City of Topeka, Kansas
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 9, 2007No. 06-4026 JARPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBINSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff David L. Bell brings this action against the City of Topeka 1 alleging un reasonable use of force, negligent training, and negligent supervision resulting from plaintiffs arrest in March 2004. This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 85). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants defendant’s motion and dismisses this action.
1. Summary Judgment Standard
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Danaher v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2011
- Stewart v. City of Prairie VillageDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Moss v. Bluecross, Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Law Co. v. Mohawk Construction & Supply Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Peterson v. Garmin International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.