Legal Opinion

State v. Mazurek

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1976No. O-75-480PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

John Mazurek, hereinafter referred to as defendant, doing business as Rentex of Tulsa, was charged by Information in the District Court, Tulsa County, Case No. CRM-75-366, with the misdemeanor offense of Operating As a Real Estate Broker Without a License, in violation of 59 O.S. Supp.1974, § 858-301. A Motion to Dismiss was filed by the defendant challenging the constitutionality of 59 O.S.Supp. 1974, § 858-101, et seq. as applied to Ren-tex of Tulsa in Tulsa County.

Thereafter, the trial court allowed the defendant and the State to file briefs on the Motion to Dismiss…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ArnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Pugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Real Estate Commission v. PharesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MaddenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. State v. TinklerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Opinion No. (1979), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1979
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API