Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Arnett
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 13, 1950No. A-11451PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, P. J.
This is an original action in habeas corpus instituted by the petitioner, James Arnett, for the purpose of securing his release from confinement in the county jail of Kiowa county.
The facts are not disputed. On July 28, 1949, the petitioner entered his plea of guilty in the county court of Kiowa county to the offense of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and the court by its judgment fixed the punishment at thirty days in the county jail and a fine of f 100 and costs, which fine and cost's if not paid, both by the formal judgment of the court and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte BoydCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
- Ex Parte AutryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- Ex Parte EatonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Ex Parte KingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Degraffenreid v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- In Re the Habeas Corpus of LutkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Webb v. MaynardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State v. KooCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.