State v. Tinkler
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANE, Presiding Judge:
This is an appeal brought by the State of Oklahoma from a decision by a magistrate during a preliminary examination in Push-mataha County District Court, Case Nos. CRF-89-066 and CRF-89-067, holding that the procedures established by the legislature and codified at 22 O.S.Supp.1989, § 751 are unconstitutional. At the outset, we must note that the record before us fails to establish the posture in which the case now stands. The State has not provided any information which would indicate under which subsection of 22 O.S.1981, § 1053 the instant appeal is pursued.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Diaz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Application of MeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
- Inverarity v. ZumwaltCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Randolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- STATE v. FEEKENCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- Office of the State Chief Medical Examiner ex rel. Pruitt v. ReevesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- Randolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Randolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.