Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 1986No. 833PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROWLEY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an Order denying appellant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal. Appellant sought acquittal on the ground that the evidence presented at his first two trials, each of which ended in a hung jury, was insufficient. He asserts that we have jurisdiction of his appeal by virtue of Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(5) because the denial of his motion to acquit “is tantamount to the grant of a new trial for the Commonwealth.”

Appellant presents two issues for review:

1. Did the trial court err in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal?

2. Does the double…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. GaborSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Commonwealth v. LiddickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Rohr v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. LaudenslagerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. OwenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. O'BlackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. ChopakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API