Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Laudenslager

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 1978No. 135PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This appeal arises from an order of the lower court granting, at appellant’s request, a new trial. For the reasons herein stated, the appeal is quashed.

The procedural history of the case is as follows. After a jury trial, appellant was convicted on December 11, 1975, of two counts of possession with intent to deliver and delivery of a controlled substance, 1 namely methylphenidate. 2 Appellant then made a motion in arrest of judgment, claiming that the evidence was not sufficient to prove “one of the elements of the crime charged, i. e., that the substance allegedly delivered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChenetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. GaborSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Commonwealth v. TeadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. LiddickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. PollickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. DormanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. MolyneauxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. NugentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. SlaughterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API