Legal Opinion

Americare Corp. v. Misenko

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1984No. 83-1145PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary issue presented, which is procedural in nature, is whether the dismissal of the notice of appeal on the grounds that it was not timely filed was proper. For the reasons that follow, this court holds that the court of appeals correctly dismissed the notice of appeal as being untimely.

The resolution of this controversy necessarily involves the interpretation and application of Local Rule 18 of the Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull County that provides as follows:

“18.01(A) Counsel for the party in whose favor * * * judgment * * * is entered in a cause in Civil or Domestic Relations…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steadley v. MontanyaOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Moldovan v. Cuyahoga County Welfare DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Rogers v. United Presidential Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Levy v. MorrisseyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Culler v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API