Legal Opinion

Moldovan v. Cuyahoga County Welfare Department

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1986No. 85-1619PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question before us is whether failure of the common pleas court to serve notice of its final appealable order on appellant or her attorney, whose names and addresses were known, frustrates the purposes of law and justice. We find that it does, and reverse the appellate court’s judgment.

Every litigant in Ohio is entitled to “[a]n appeal as of right * * * by filing a notice of appeal * * * within the time allowed * * App. R. 3(A). The notice of appeal “* * * shall designate the judgment, order or part thereof appealed from * * App. R. 3(C). App. R. 4(A) requires that civil appeals be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Bosco v. City of EuclidOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Americare Corp. v. MisenkoOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Radiology Associates, Inc. v. Ohio Valley Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Atkinson v. Grumman Ohio Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Swander Ditch Landowners' Ass'n v. Joint Board of HuronOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Mancino v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Central Ohio Transit Authority v. TimsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API