Isenberg v. Rainier
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, fifth district, rendered in favor of the defendants dismissing the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.
This cause was submitted to the court below upon an agreed statement of facts. The action is upon a written undertaking given in an action in the City Court of Stamford, Conn., in which the present plaintiff was the plaintiff and one Horace 0. Flanagan was the defendant. *499This undertaking is known in the statutory law of Connecticut as_ a “ Special Bail Bond.” The condition of said bond was that, if the said Horace 0. Flanagan should appear and abide by the judgment of the said City Court of Stamford, and pay any judgment which might be rendered against him in said case, then the obligation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ruggles v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Olcott v. . the Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Waterman v. A. & W. Sprague Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Hatch v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Moloney v. TiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Isenberg v. RainierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Whiting v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- American Surety Company of New York v. John H. C. GainfortCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Dodge v. HolbrookNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- Weidenfeld v. Pacific Improvement Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.