Legal Opinion
Tran v. Tehrani
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 4, 1990No. 85-0628C; CA A48206PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Plaintiffs petition for review of our decision. 99 Or App 141, 781 P2d 393 (1989). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it, modify the opinion and adhere to it as modified.
In our opinion, we stated:
“The dispute arose under the modified contract that included the new plans and specifications. Accordingly, we review the evidence of defendant’s intent at the time of modification.” 99 Or App at 145.
Plaintiffs assert that whether defendant’s intent was fraudulent must be determined as of the time that he signed the original contract. Accepting plaintiffs’ assertion,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Karsun v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Tran v. TehraniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burgdorf v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Communications Group, Inc. v. GTE MobilnetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Hevern v. Walter E. Heller Western, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990