Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Bennett v. Bonner

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1950No. 8941Published

1DissentJustice Angstman

My disagreement with the majority opinion is not with many of the fundamental principles enunciated in it but with their applicability to the facts of this case. The majority opinion is based upon a misconception of the facts. Governor Bonner’s orders do not divest Judge Bennett of authority or jurisdiction over cases in which he is not disqualified. Judge Bennett is not forced to abdicate or stand aside “while others take over his office, ’ ’ save as to cases in which he is disqualified and as to those the law and not the orders of Governor Bonner forces him to stand aside.

In the answer and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Ryan v. WestonMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Duff v. KeenanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. State ex rel. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. ClancyMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Cormark v. ColemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API