Legal Opinion

Isla Ballard v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2016No. ED103415PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColleen Dolan, Judge

I. Introduction

Isla Ballard, (“Movant”), appeals the denial of his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief -without an evidentia-ry hearing. In his first point, Movant contends the motion court erred because he pled facts establishing ineffective assistance of counsel in that his counsel had an actual conflict by accepting legal fees from a complaining witness in the underlying case, and plea counsel coerced Movant into pleading guilty by stating he could not afford to go to trial. In his second point, Movant alleges plea counsel was ineffective in thqt he failed to adequately…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. DriverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  5. Burnett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oliphant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Lowery v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Nunley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Brown v. JenningsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Colegrove v. McBeeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API