Legal Opinion

Fuerst v. Noell

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1946No. 13320PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment in an interpleader action brought, by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company under the Federal Interpleader Act1 against all of the parties to this appeal. The judgment dismissed the cross-bill and claim of the appellants Upon the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and awarded so much of the impleaded fund as was in controversy to Charles P. Noell.

The bill in interpleader filed by the Railroad Company June .5, 1945, shows that Noell is an attorney and a citizen of Missouri; that Harry G. Fuerst is a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Sanders v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Dennis v. Village of Tonka BayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  4. Cleveland, Etc., Railway Co. v. MoneyhunIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Masters v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buder v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Harris v. Capehart-Farnsworth Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API