Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Day

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1978No. A76 07 09245, SC 25578PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff filed an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The trial court allowed defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground the action was barred by the two-year statute of limitations, ORS 12.110(1).

The accident in which plaintiff alleges he was injured occurred on January 29, 1975. The complaint was filed on July 2, 1976. The defendant’s whereabouts were unknown, and plaintiff secured an order allowing service by publication. The affidavit seeking service by publication was clearly defective, and the purported service was quashed by the trial court on October 18, 1976.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Whittington v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sisk v. McPartlandOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Tinsley v. LombardOregon Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hahm v. HillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Harp v. LouxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Rouse v. ConnellySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  4. Grant's Mechanical, Inc. v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API