Legal Opinion

Holland City State Bank v. Meeuwsen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1916No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Ottawa; Cross, J. Assumpsit by the Holland City State Bank against John Meeuwsen and others on- a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment in the circuit court of Ottawa county, upon a directed verdict against defendants, for the sum of $419.04, as a balance then due upon the following promissory note:

“Holland, Mich., March 21, 1914.
“Six months after date we promise to pay to the order of Holland City State Bank, $503.26, five hundred three dollars and twenty-six cents, with interest at the rate of seven per cent, per annum, payable at Holland City State Bank, Holland, Michigan, value received.
“Due Sept. 21.
“[Signed] John Meeuwsen.”-

And indorsed on the back thereof:

“[Signed] Johannes Meeuwsen.
“[Signed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheffler v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Price v. KlettMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Cooper v. SonkMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Diamant v. ChestnutMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API