Legal Opinion

Werlinger v. Warner

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 14, 2005No. 53558-7-IPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 When a defendant whose liability insurer has acted in bad faith proceeds to make his own settlement with an injured plaintiff, the amount of that settlement may become the presumptive measure of damage in the bad faith lawsuit, but only if a trial court determines that the settlement is reasonable. In this case, a defendant insured with limits of $25,000 obtained a discharge in bankruptcy for his liability for a terrible automobile accident, and then confessed judgment for $5 million as part of a settlement that assigned his bad faith claim to the injured plaintiff. The court found the $5…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Glover v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Besel v. Viking InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bird v. Best Plumbing Group, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Werlinger v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Werlinger v. Clarendon National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Water's Edge Homeowners Ass'n v. Water's Edge AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Meadow Valley Owners Ass'n v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API