Legal Opinion

McCray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 9, 1996No. 95-1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).' Although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we vacate the lien for attorney fees imposed upon appellant because appellant was not afforded notice of intent to seek such a lien, or an opportunity to contest its amount. E.g., Bryant v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In the Interest of L.A.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paige v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API