Legal Opinion

Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. v. Cormetech, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 23, 2015No. Case No. 5:14cv514Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. KATHLEEN B. BURKE, United States Magistrate Judge.

In this diversity action, Plaintiff Bab-cock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. (“B & W” or “Babcock”) seeks indemnity from Defendant Cormetech, Inc. (“Cormetech”) for amounts B & W paid to a third party, Kansas City Power & Light Company (“KCP & L”) pursuant to a settlement agreement. The matter is before the Court on a discovery dispute. B & W has refused to produce communications pertaining to its settlement negotiations and mediation with KCP & L, asserting that the federal settlement privilege recognized by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Chiles Power Supply, Inc., D/B/A Heatway Systems, Robert S. JulianCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Echo, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation v. The Whitson Company, Inc. D/B/A Power Tool Company, a Tennessee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API