Legal Opinion

Lee v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 6, 1979No. 1 CA-IC 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

The questions urged on this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission’s hearing officer in a workmen’s compensation proceeding have arisen because the injured workman sought f nd received unauthorized treatment from a physician other than the physician designated by the employer pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1070.

Petitioner’s employer, Associated Grocers, was self-insured and had complied with the requirements of A.R.S. § 23-1070, which allows a self-insured employer to make its own contractual arrangements for the provision of medical, surgical, and hospital…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baudanza v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Markham v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API