Hamm, Receiver v. Drew
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal Bom Dallas. Tried below before Hon! George ET. Ald-REDGE. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
GABBETT, Presiding Judge,
Section B.—Suit was against Drew and Cockrell for the recovery of five stallions. Appellant sued as the receiver of the J. Stone & Sons Live Stock Company. Appellee Drew, who had charge of the stallions for said company, sold them to the appellee Cockrell a short time before Hamm was appointed receiver. His authority to sell was denied. The petition, after setting out that Drew was the bailee of the stallions to keep and manage the same for said company, and describing and alleging the value of the stallions, charged, in effect, that on the 21st day of May, 1886, Drew…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Holmes v. TynerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Cox v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Dallas Ice Factory & Cold Storage Co. v. Crawford & CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Haltom v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.