Legal Opinion

Haltom v. McKinley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 11, 1933No. 4367PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

The appeal is predicated upon the error claimed to have been committed by the trial court in peremptorily instructing a verdict against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendants. At the close of the evidence the plaintiffs and the defendants each requested a peremptory instruction to the jury to return a verdict in their favor. It is admitted in the appellants’ brief that: “There is no controverted issue of fact in this case. It is >a matter of the interpretation and construction of the facts according to the recognized and established rules therefor and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rosenborough v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Ruffier v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Miller v. YturriaTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Heirs of Burton v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Herring v. SwainTexas Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Bustamante, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. Jordan v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Stewart v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. PHB, INC. v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Fuller v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API