Legal Opinion

Tattersfield v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1932No. File No. 6838PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.

Plaintiff Tattersfield resided in Moody county, S. D., for a number of years and was a customer and depositor of Moody County Bank. He removed from South Dakota some years ago, but after his removal continued to do business with Moody County Bank and to maintain an account therein which he used to a considerable extent as a working account for handling and clearing various investments. Plaintiff was the owner of a real estate mortgage given by one Smith, residing near Col-man, S. D. In October, 1925, Smith, intending to pay the mortgage, wrote plaintiff requesting that the note, mortgage, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitcomb v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Northwest Lumber Co. v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hanson v. SognSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tattersfield v. Independent School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Koepp v. Security-Home Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Smith v. TattersfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Janssen v. Emery Ind. School Dist.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Janssen v. Emery Independent School District No. 1South Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API