Legal Opinion

Tattersfield v. Independent School District

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1932No. File No. 6853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.

This case arises indirectly from the transactions between Tattersfield, plaintiff herein, and Moody County Bank which were presented to this court by the cases of Tattersfield v. Smith, 60 S. D. 471, 245 N. W. 44, No. 6838, and Smith v. Tattersfield, 60 S. D. 466, 245 N. W. 49, No. 6999, opinions this day filed. The Moody County Bank was closed for liquidation by the superintendent of banks May 22, 1926. Since some time in February, 1926, the bank had been indebted to Tattersfield in the sum of $6,994.15 upon general deposit, and on April 23, 1926, the bank indorsed and delivered to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barry v. StoverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Smith v. McCowanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kirby v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Slagle & Co. v. Elk Point Independent Consolidated School District No. 3South Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State Bank v. HayesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waverly Independent Consolidated School District No. 1 v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Waverly Independent Consolidated School District No. 1 v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API