Legal Opinion

Richard v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 21, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Order unanimously modified by permitting the examination of defendant Potter as a party and a witness without prejudice to an application to the trial court to use the deposition for all purposes pursuant to CPLR 3117 (subd. [a], par. 3). As so modified, order affirmed, without costs.

As to her codefendant, defendant Potter is a witness (Nixon v. Beacon Transp. Corp., 239 App. Div. 830, 831; Napier v. Bossard, 102 F. 2d 467, 468). Plaintiffs would be entitled to an examination of said party as a witness “where the court on motion determines that there are adequate special circumstances ” (CPLR…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Napier v. BossardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Nixon v. Beacon Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nedball v. TellefsenNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Mull v. StreakerNew York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API