Legal Opinion

Fyles v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 12, 1982No. 135-81PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBillings, J.

The plaintiffs-appellants filed a complaint in the nature of a mandamus pursuant to V.R.C.P. 75 against the chairman of the Prudential Committee of Fire District No. 2, Shelburne, Vermont, requesting that the court order the defendants to assume the ownership and maintenance of a lateral sewer line from plaintiffs’ residence to the defendants’ sewer main. The trial court after a hearing denied the relief requested. Plaintiffs appeal.

In 1950 Fire District No. 2 was chartered and subsequently a sewer main was installed along the east side of U.S. Route 7. It extended as far as, what was then,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dutch Hill Inn, Inc. v. PattenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  2. Corcoran v. Village of BenningtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  3. Brown v. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. Berlin v. BerlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  2. State v. FordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Alger v. Dept. of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. In Re HartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. Bryant v. Town of EssexSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API