Legal Opinion

Wood v. Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1902PublishedCited by 12 opinions

■ 7\ctioN by I. W. Wood against the Atlantic and North Carolina Railroad Company, heard by Judge Thomas A. McNeill and a jury, at May Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of ObaveN County. Prom a judgment setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial, the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClaRK, J.

When the trial Judge sets aside or refuses to set aside a verdict on the ground that it is against the weight c£ the evidence, or excessive, or for other matter resting in his irreviewable discretion, no appeal lies. Clark’s Code (3d Ed.), pages 736, 746. But when the verdict is set aside as a matter of law, as here, because the Judge held that he had erroneously refused a prayer asked by the losing party, an appeal lies. Bryan v. Heck, 67 N. C., 322; Gay v. Nash, 84 N. C., 333; Thomas v. Myers, 87 N. C., 31. An appeal lay at once, because a verdict is a substantial right, and the appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Gay v. . NashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Bryan v. . HeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sitterson v. . SittersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Shives v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Abernethy v. Yount.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. GatlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Johnson v. Reformers.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API