Legal Opinion

Gay v. . Nash

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PROCEEDING to enforce an agricultural lien, removed from Richmond county and tried at Fall Term, 1380, of StaNLY Superior Court, before Seymour, J. 'There was a verdict for plaintiff, and from the refusal of the judge to give judgment thereon for the reason set out in the opinion of this court, the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The plaintiff made affidavit in proper form as required by Battle’s Revisal, ch. 65, § 20, and sued out of the clerk’s office a warrant directed to the sheriff, by virtue of which he seized and sold certain crops of the defendant raised in the year 1876 for $389.79 to satisfy a debt in the sum of $546.95, alleged to be due the plaintiff, and a lien thereon for advances made in their cultivation. The defend* ant in his answer admits his giving the lien but denies that there is anything due the plaintiff for the advances author-ised therein, or that he had any intent to remove and place the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. North Carolina Ore Dressing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  2. Moore v. EdmistonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. Bryan v. . HeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. Gay v. . NashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Reformers.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Wood v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Huggins v. . KetchumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  4. Cottingham v. . McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Oil Co. v. Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API