Baltimore & Ohio Rd. v. Village of Oak Hill
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMauck, P. J.
The plaintiff, a railroad corpora tion, owns and operates a line of railway through the village of Oak Hill. The council of that village, on April 1,1922, levied a special assessment against the railroad company for the improvement of East street in said village, said assessment amounting to something over $3,000. . It is now sought to enjoin the collection of that assessment, the claim being made that the improvement in question was in part or in whole made not upon a public street of the village, but upon land belonging to the railroad company itself. It is further claimed that no benefits…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Rhodes v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1840
- City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BeckOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Baxter v. Van HouterOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Jackson v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In the Matter of Chicago and North Western Railway CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- Wabash Ry. Co. v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Kansas City Southern Railroad v. City of DeridderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Johnson v. Village of New ConcordOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Craig v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.