Legal Opinion

City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Beck

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1924No. 17985PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The controlling question involved in this case is whether, when assessments have been made on a lot or parcel of land in a municipal corporation, which-a court on appeal has found exceeded 33 1-3 per cent, of the actual value thereof after the improvement was made, and the prop erty owners have failed to enter objection to the assessments under the procedure provided for such eases in Section 3848 of the General Code, a court of equity will grant relief by injunction.

The sections of the General Code principally involved in the case are as follows:

■Section 3819 :

“The council shall limit all…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Owens v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Smith v. CarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. City of Denver v. DumarsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  5. Rucker Bros. v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tiemann v. University of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Ryan v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hammond v. WinderOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Conn v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Domito v. Village of MaumeeOhio Supreme Court · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API