State v. Van Zomeren
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[HI] Austin Van- Zomeren appeals a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of driving with a blood alcohol concentration of at least .08 percent. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion" in admitting the results of Van Zomeren’s blood test.
I
[¶ 2] A Burleigh County sheriffs deputy stopped Van Zomeren for crossing the fog line while driving and arrested him for driving under the influence of alcohol after failing a preliminary breath test. The deputy read Van Zomeren the implied consent advisory and he agreed to take a blood test, which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. SchwalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Hagel v. HagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- McNamara v. Director of North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ell v. Director, Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. BlaskowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- McClintock v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Hoistad v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. BlaskowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.