Legal Opinion

State v. Van Zomeren

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2016No. 20150267PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[HI] Austin Van- Zomeren appeals a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of driving with a blood alcohol concentration of at least .08 percent. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion" in admitting the results of Van Zomeren’s blood test.

I

[¶ 2] A Burleigh County sheriffs deputy stopped Van Zomeren for crossing the fog line while driving and arrested him for driving under the influence of alcohol after failing a preliminary breath test. The deputy read Van Zomeren the implied consent advisory and he agreed to take a blood test, which…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. SchwalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hagel v. HagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. McNamara v. Director of North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ell v. Director, Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. BlaskowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. McClintock v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Hoistad v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State v. BlaskowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API