Keller v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Richard Keller appeals a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation hearing officer’s decision suspending his driving privileges. Because we conclude the approved method for administering an Intoxilyzer test was not followed and no expert testimony was offered on the effect, if any, of the deviation, we reverse and remand.
I
[¶2] According to the administrative hearing testimony, a Bismarck police officer stopped Keller for driving over a lane-dividing line. The officer noted Keller had glossy, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SchwalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Schwind v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Ringsaker v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Buchholz v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Pesanti v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gillmore v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Von RudenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Havemeier v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Gackle v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- Havemeier v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.