Legal Opinion

Tiemann v. Santarelli Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 31, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIOLETTE, Justice.

After a trial before a single justice in the Superior Court, Kennebec County, the court ordered judgment in favor of the defendant on the plaintiff’s claim that her discharge by the defendant constituted unlawful employment discrimination. The plaintiff appeals, alleging that several errors in the proceeding below require reversal of the Superior Court’s decision. The plaintiff’s first two contentions concern evi-dentiary rulings by the presiding justice; the plaintiff argues that the trial court committed prejudicial error by excluding, first, the testimony of a witness for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Maine Human Rights Commission v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Maine Human Rights Commission Ex Rel. Kellman v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. Margani v. SandersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Tew Mac Aero Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Crockett v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Crook v. RussellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  4. Reardon v. LarkinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. HAYES v. NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API